Search This Blog

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

The ABCs of WMDs - Debunking Another GOP Lie

Below is a thorough debunking of the latest right-wing narrative (i.e. LIE), which claims there were WMDs in Iraq. A friend posted it on Facebook earlier today along with a link to a BBC article about an interview with the title,

George W Bush had 'sickening feeling' over WMD lack
Let's get something straight.
From this 2010 BBC article, Pres. Bush is quoted, either from an interview or from his then-released memoir, that he felt "sick" that no WMDs were found in Iraq, despite all of his administration's claims that Hussein had them and/or was actively producing them or preparing to do so. Yet, in the most recent big NY Times articles on the subject, not only were there Sarin-containing weapons, the CIA was actually purchasing stockpiles from some unnamed source in 2005 & 2006, OLD weapons that THE U.S. HELPED Hussein build during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s!
These aren't the WMDs we were told about by the Bush administration, unless they were continually, conveniently leaving out that they were specifically referring to the then-20-year-old weapons, when they claimed Hussein was actively making them.
2002- Bush says there are WMDs in Iraq
2005-06- U.S. finds, buys, destroys old WMDs in Iraq, poisoning U.S. troops in the process (see the
long NY Times article from last year)
2010- Bush regrets not finding WMDs in Iraq
2014- NY Times runs article about these old WMDs made during Reagan administration, Republicans shout "SEE?!?!?"
2015- NY Times runs article about cia involvement, Republicans shout "NOW WILL YOU ADMIT BUSH DIDN'T LIE?!?"
Except for that part about Bush not understanding why they never found the WMDs they found in 2005, it all makes sense, right?
Thanks, Aaron.

I share Aaron's post with you, dear readers, because the current crop of hypocritical, right-wing propagandists are very good at telling only part of a story, conflating it with a cherry-picked section from another narrative, and calling the resulting distortion "the truth."

They count on the fact that most folks won't immediately recognize the subterfuge. They know that their ideological acolytes will spread the lie like the malicious virus it is. Meanwhile, those who do recognize the duplicity will not be able either to stop its proliferation or to immunize the unsuspecting against the malignant payload it carries.

In case you don't know who these propagandists are, I offer the following:


And should you be unsure as to the danger posed by the malignant payload their lies carry, consider this:

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Sunday Funnies 150215

The Sunday Funnies word of the week is clarify:

clar-i-fy |ˈklarəˌfī|
verb ( -fies, -fied) [ trans. ]
1 make (a statement or situation) less confused and more clearly comprehensible : the report managed to clarify the government's position.
2 [often as adj. ] ( clarified) melt (butter) in order to separate out the impurities.

DERIVATIVES
clarification |ˌklarəfiˈkā sh ən| noun
clarifier noun

ORIGIN Middle English (in the senses [set forth clearly] and [make pure and clean] ): from Old French clarifier, from late Latin clarificare, from Latin clarus ‘clear.’

* * *
Yes, dear reader, in this week's Sunday Funnies, I will attempt to lift the fog that shrouds a passel of problems that befuddle your (and my) mundane existence. Metaphorically, the cartoons will function as fog lights and the comments as a fog horn.

1. How to Play the Percentages

Hmmmmmm...perhaps another tax cut would help the poor blighter.

2. Let me make myself perfectly clear...




3. Vive La Différence!

That was then; this is now (not necessarily in that order).

4. He's neither a scientist nor a doctor, but he knows what he believes is "true."

I, on the contrary, believe he doesn't know a diagnosis from his bunghole.

5. This should clear up why the big boss makes the big bucks.


6. Recent research shows that climate science deniers are am-fib-ians.

And their elected representatives don't want to jump to any conclusions fearing that they might wind up in hot water come election day.

7. Specializing in Cross Words from the Bench.

Move along, folks! There's nothing to see here.
"Judicial activism," you say?
Nope! No siree! Judge Moor here, he's a Republican, and we all know Republicans hate and won't tolerate judicial activism.

8. Comic Economics - Double-Duty Drawing

What genius! Cartoonist Scott Metzger can recycle this one. All he has to do is color the ties black and change "Jehovah's Witness" to "Mormon Missionary." 

9. And while we're asking...

Q. Why hasn't Fox suspended Bill O'Reilly for lying about his supposed "combat experience" when he never served in the military?
A. Because Fox has no problem with their stable of actors, who pose as journalists, spreading right-wing lies. In fact, that's what they're paid to do.

10. The GOP Alternative to Obamacare



11. Exposing What Really Goes On Behind Closed Doors


Link to Source

12. Oh No! (Item 9 redux)

Not to worry dude. Bill O'Reilly is still on the air lying about his non-existent combat experience and just about every other subject he covers (in manure).

13. Snow on the Roof; Fire in the Furnace vs. The Lights are on, but Nobody's Home

AKA: The Old, Rich, White-Guys Club (with token minority and female members)

14. A Bonus Comic Offering Clarity and Profound Insight Into Human Relationships

Valentines Day is Actually a Religious Holiday

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Reviving The Spirit of '76!

North Carolina, February 14, 2015:

This march is not like the self-serving, astroturfed, Tea Party "patriot" rallies financed by the Heritage Foundation and hyped by the corporate media.

These people are demonstrating genuine patriotism. They are fed up with being trickled down upon by those who game the economic system and then claim entitlement to preferential treatment because of their wealth.


* * *


US Uncut

Happening NOW: Tens of thousands are marching on the North Carolina State Capitol demanding a $15 an hour minimum wage, voting rights, environmental justice, affordable healthcare, reproductive rights, and racial justice.




Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Anger vs. Bitterness

Readers of this blog may have noticed anger in much of what I write in my posts, and you can rest assured that it will continue.

Anger expressed in art is an indication that one has seen an injustice; has reacted in a healthy, normal manner; and, as a result, feels compelled to share the reasons behind the anger in the hope that others might understand and join the fight to eliminate the injustice.

Would that the haters among us were capable of understanding this truth.

Instead, the Limbaughs, Hannitys, and O'Reillys, of the rabid-right bitterly ridicule anyone who dares to expose injustices they believe should be swept under the rug - injustices they secretly cherish. Their bitterness comes from a fear that they might lose the special privileges afforded to them by the perpetuation of those injustices - privileges to which they believe they are entitled, like preferential treatment vis-à-vis:
  • employment
  • education
  • bank loans
  • run-ins with the law
  • and a host of other perks based on their supposed superiority to those negatively impacted by the injustice they deny exist
I hope that you do not mistake my anger at them for bitterness. To that end I offer the following:

The below shows a conversation which took place in 2006 between Maya Angelou and David Chappelle. Chappelle is a comedian, but there's nothing funny about their powerful dialogue.

Watch it in its entirety, payin special attention to the comments Maya Angelou makes at the end regarding the difference between anger and bitterness.




You should be angry. You must not be bitter. Bitterness is like cancer. It eats upon the host. It doesn’t do anything to the object of its displeasure. So use that anger. You write it. You paint it. You dance it. You march it. You vote it. You do everything about it. You talk it. Never stop talking it.
...and, in my case, you blog it.

Would that the haters among us were capable of understanding this truth. It would make all the difference.

Sunday, February 8, 2015

Sunday Funnies 150208

The Sunday Funnies word of the week is in a compromising position:

red-handed

adj. caught in the act
More words related to in a compromising position
blatantly, guilty, openly
(from Thesaurus.com)
Notice: I intend to take liberties with this week's phrase, parsing its components and mutilating or mutating them as I see fit.


1. The Spirit of Compromise

Don't you just love it when a plan comes together?

2. Caught Red-Handed




3. Position Compromising The Health Of Our Nation




4. The Captain Is Predisposed and Soon to be Red-Handed

You can pan me for including this comic, but it hooked me.

5. Blatantly, Openly Guilty, But Quick-Witted




6. A Company Of Uncompromising Clowns With Questionable Positions




7. Oh, the humanity!

Precisely! 
When the fabric of society is compromised by the actions of the selfish and the ignorant, we're all put at risk.

8. Between A Rock And A Soft Place

If you don't know why Sisyphus is, look it up.

9. Egg-zactly So!



Link to Source

10. He's Prone to Compromising His Health



11. Not to worry. He's immune to facts.

Sure his mouth's full, but he usually talks out of a different orifice.

12. Guess which is the Democrat and which the Republican...

Hint: One believes in and has has a principal interest in sharing the wealth; the other not so much, principally because it would mean compromising his self-interest.

13. Much like a dog that chased and caught a car...


Friday, February 6, 2015

Anticipating "Go Set a Watchman"


Since this blog exists in large part a paean to the ideas and attitudes regarding truth and justice found in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, I have closely followed reports about the discovery and pending publication of a second Lee novel. 

According to Miss Lee, the novel, entitled Go Set a Watchman was actually written before To Kill a Mockingbird. It is about "a woman nicknamed Scout, who returns home to Maycomb, Ala., to visit her father, Atticus." Readers of as well as those who have only seen the movie version of To Kill a Mockingbird know those names and may even think of them as friends rather than fictional characters.

When Harper Lee submitted Go Set a Watchman for possible publication in the 1950s, her editor suggested that she rewrite it from the viewpoint of Scout as a young girl. She did as she was told and the result was To Kill a Mockingbird. Lee's publisher, HarperCollins, has scheduled a July 14 release of two million copies of Go Set a Watchman.

I intend to purchase one of them hot off the press.

I already have ideas about what I might find in the pages of this novel, and I'm looking forward to discovering how close to the mark my shots in the dark turn out to be. My anticipation in this regard is a direct result of having taught ninth grade English for many years.

Active reading is a critical thinking skill that involves not only reading a novel but considering what has been revealed and making guesses about what is to come as you read, much as if you are carrying on a conversation with the author. I endeavored to teach this skill to my ninth grade English classes in the 1980s and 90s as part of a unit on The Novel covered at the end of each academic year. The novel we read was To Kill a Mockingbird.

Those who have learned to read actively understand how easily that skill translates to and is useful in real life when following an unfolding news story. The developing story about Go Set a Watchman involves concerns about whether Harper Lee, at age 88, having had a stroke in 2007, and residing in an assisted living facility, is making her own decisions or is being manipulated by others to cash in on the publication of the rediscovered manuscript.

Active readers would be correct to infer from the tone of my last sentence that I do not completely trust the motives of Miss Lee's friend and lawyer, who discovered the manuscript, and also those of her agent, since both presumably stand to profit from the publication of a new novel by one of America's most loved authors.

That skepticism is another shot in the dark, the accuracy of which will be revealed as the story behind Go Set a Watchman unfolds.

Stay tuned to this blog for further details. 

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Homer vs. The GOP - A Classic Encounter With Deception

The Backstory


Today's blog post comes to you courtesy of a long-time friend, Patrick Tucker Kelly, who lives in Israel and posts on Facebook as Kelly Michaels. This morning, or evening, depending on whose clock you want to believe, he posted the following:
So the Republicans are attempting to overturn the ACA again...for the 56th time. They continue to waste millions of dollars on a bill that President Obama is guaranteed to veto, if it ever gets passed. Furthermore, this is a veto they have no hope of ever overriding, so why would they do this again and again and again? 
The definition of insanity is "doing the same thing over and over again but expecting a different result." The GOP's obsession with overturning the ACA simply confirms the reality of this definition.
I've followed the GOP-controlled House of Representatives and the fifty-plus votes taken to overturn the ACA, but I reached a very different conclusion about their motives, so I replied:
Actually they're not expecting a different result for doing the same thing. They're simply expecting, and will probably achieve, a result different from the one you think they're after. 
They know they can't overturn the ACA, but they also know that this course of action will keep their "sheeple" happy and blindly voting against their own best interests in the next election.
Because they're not really expecting a different result for their anti-ACA votes, they're not insane as in "batshit crazy." It's more like being "crazy like a fox;" or; to put it bluntly, it shows clearly that a bunch of sociopaths are running the once-proud GOP.
His reply:
Sociopaths is the word, George. I can't believe anyone votes for these people.
My reply began as a simple affirmation but mid-way through it morphed into this post:
You can't believe it because you have decided that thinking and skepticism are better than the false reassurance offered by those who peddle the snake oil of blind obedience and "absolute truth."
Look for more on this in my next blog post.

And here it is...


I wrote that sentence promising "more on this" because a blast from the past had just exploded in my cranium, and I knew I had much more to say to my friend than I could express in the disjointed snippets which make up Facebook posts. It arrived fully-formed as a palpable, 3-D connection linking what's going on in America today with one of the famous adventures found in The Odyssey by Homer.

If you've read The Odyssey, you know that Odysseus is the eponymous hero of that classic work of Greek literature and mythology.

On one level, The Odyssey can be read as a simple adventure story about Odysseus and the many dangers he faced in his ten-year journey to return to Ithaca and the home, wife, and son he had left when summoned by his king to fight in The Trojan War.

It is important to know that in the mythology of any culture, the hero is an exemplar who represents what is best, good, and right in the ethos of his or her people - an authentic human being, a unique individual who faces and overcomes the forces in life which lure others into leading inauthentic and corrupt lives.

Examined on that level, the adventures of Odysseus address the struggle all human beings face as they search for meaning and authenticity in their lives. This is the central theme of all hero tales.

The adventure in which Odysseus listens to and survives the song of the Sirens was the palpable, 3-D connection that exploded in my cranium as I replied to my friend.

The Sirens of Greek mythology were female beings whose beautiful singing lured weary sailors to death on the rocks from which they sang. Their songs promised everlasting peace and rest, which, it is worth noting, the sailors would find in death. In other words, it's the story of an ancient deception.

In much the same way, today's Republicans sing a deceptive and dangerous song to the American electorate.

In the House of Representatives, and now in the Senate, they promise prosperity to all in the form of tax cuts for the wealthiest among us as they simultaneously hold votes to overturn the Affordable Care Act, legislation which helps those who are not so well-heeled.

In lockstep they rail against "entitlements" which help the middle and lower classes tread water. In the next breath they tell us that the wealthiest among us, by virtue of their wealth, are entitled to an ever increasing share of the wealth of our nation - wealth produced in large part by people working for a disgracefully insufficient, so-called "minimum wage."

At the state level, Republican governors, like Ohio's John Kasich, seek rate increases in the regressive sales tax, which negatively impacts the least well off. At the same time, he and his counterparts oppose any increase in the rate of the more progressive income tax. Why, you may wonder, would members of the party which claims to hate all taxes seek tax increases of any sort? Why they're needed to offset the bribes...er..."tax incentives" demanded by and granted to their corporate cronies, of course.

But, like Odysseus, I've been blown off course. He by the capricious gods; I by the ill winds coming from Congress and the Ohio statehouse.


In The Odyssey, we learn that Odysseus was a favorite of Athena, the goddess of wisdom. She liked him and helped him precisely because he was wary and skeptical. He wasn't the biggest or the baddest Greek, but he was the most clever. You may recall that it was he who designed the Trojan Horse and he who led the raiding party that hid within it.

In the adventure with the Sirens, Odysseus put wax in the ears of his crew so they could not hear the song of the Sirens. He had them lash him to the mast of his ship with orders to tie him more tightly if he tried to get loose. He heard the enchanting songs and strained mightily against the ropes. He cried out in anguish to his deafened crew to let him go to those who promised everlasting peace and rest. Then he collapsed, weeping in despair as his ship sailed out of range of the singing.

He had heard the song of the Sirens and had survived, but not without experiencing the pain that comes from learning that what has been taught to believe to be truth is in fact a lie.


Like Odysseus, we face forces in life which conspire to deceive us. And like him we can take steps to shield ourselves from the harm, but not the pain that comes from the struggle to find the truth.  

A major threat Americans face comes from the siren songs of today's Republicans and their "christian" fundamentalist allies. Both sing songs which promise escape from the struggles of life, a
nd like the Sirens, they are not lying. They're just not telling us the whole story.

They sing,
You can be worry-free.
You can be happy.
You can enjoy economic prosperity.
Just follow us without question and agree to believe that whatever we tell you is the absolute truth.

Wealth will surely trickle down to you thanks to the munificence of the super rich; and if it doesn't, you will know that you will reap your reward in Heaven.
Their song is designed to rob us of our most precious birthright, the ability to think for ourselves. Like the Sirens in The Odyssey, they are not lying. They're just not telling us the whole story.

The crux of their message can be summed up as follows: Ignorance is bliss.

For protection against this deception we do not need to put wax in the ears of our friends and have them tie us to the mast of a ship. As I told my friend, we simply need to recognize and decide that thinking and skepticism are better than the false reassurance offered by those who peddle the snake oil of blind obedience and "absolute truth."

What's this? Another cranial explosion?


Yes!  And it's a doozy! It obliges me to conclude this post with a bit of outrageous irony.

Rereading my final paragraph above, I realized how much the advice I gave my friend sounds like a comment made by the "patron saint" of the duplicitous GOP. It was none other than Ronald "the Gipper" Reagan, who appropriated an old Russian proverb and used it when talking to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev about an arms control treaty saying, "Trust but verify." - Доверяй, но проверяй